I'm not so sure about this point. While I like to claim that sportsmanship trumps all and we are all altruistic people, at the end of the day, if the only thing preventing one of your teams from the finals is pointing out a clear rules violation (that happened to be stressed and discussed at the previous Chairman's meeting), I am not sure I would be such a great sportsman. It's a bigger than sparing a flagger some morning or casual chat about running rolls. If nothing else, a chairman needs to prioritize his or her pushers who might not have another shot at finals, the mechanics that practiced to get their pre-heat timing just perfect, and a driver who has worked at it all year, and it would be demoralizing if they didn't. At the end of the day, I don't look down on any chairman who would go through with the protest for their team like that.aepibuggy wrote:I would generally agree with this.TommyK wrote: that's lame. 5-second rule really? who protests that? Where's the sportsmanship? save it for when it causes an actual problem
I think of this as another one of those situations where the rule just sucks sometimes. Transition violations also result in DQs, even though they aren't malicious or done in the spirit of cheating in any recent case. So does pacing by idiots who you can't stop. And sometimes you have to ice your A-Team for 30 minutes while waiting for an ambulance to get to the course before your heat. There is a lot of bad luck to go around on raceday.